Q35. Was shankar treat the symptoms of evil instead of evil itself ?

shankar ka insaaf?
g m
9/25/2006 8:44 PM
i'd say that prabuji ne chutiya ke saath nainsaafi ki..
mera matlab hai ki chutiya ko malum he nahi tha ki rape karna buri baat hai, wo toh bas vitamin sex ki xtra power ka shikaar ho gaya tha..
mera khayal se asli gunehgaar ya toh wo london wali company hai jisney wo extraaa powerful gloi banayi
ya fir bulla jisne apne chote bhai chutiya ko sex education nahi di!!

what do you think?

Ismile™
9/26/2006 12:14 AM
maybe yes, plus don't you people think that shankar chose a wrong way of ending the gundagardi of these big people....whenever one bulla dies a new bulla will arrive. (probably we will get to see that in the sequel) considering the fact that shankar was a son of a police constable isn't shankar's chosen way a defeat of his father's principals?? what does this line mean - "kisi ne sach hi kaha hai, baap pe poot pita pe ghoda, kuchh nahi to thoda thoda!"


Anonymous
9/26/2006 12:32 AM
@ Gaurav - Its not Shankar's mistake. He does not kill Chutiya but only cuts-off his non-existent d**k.
But mysteriously Chutiya dies !!

Anonymous
9/26/2006 12:36 AM
@ gaurav - bhai, next you will say that Bhulla is also innocent bcoz uske maa-baap ne usey acche sanskar nahi diye. So Shankar should kill Bhulla's parents instead of Bhulla.